Senator Jota Pe Hernández read in, of, the list of relatives that Congressman David Razo located in the state with sumptuous salaries and positions.
“Look, I believe that David Razo is the faithful sample of what the historical pact represents in Colombia. A sample of slavery and exploitation when he has a worker in his 13 hours a day for 1 million pesos, without any type of benefits, without paying overtime, without paying him night surcharge, and not only for cashier, which is the position for which he hires it, but so that it will clean, clean the bathrooms. It is a sample of what the historical pact represents in terms of clientelism. in the government ”.
Subsequently, Congressman Jota Pe Hernández read the list of relatives that ran into the government of President Petro:
“For example, your uncle José Luis Mayorgathat the whole country already knows; Daniel Razo Gómezwho was there in the Ministry of Education; Camila Razo Gómez, that was in the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce; José Manuel Márquez Mallorcain Colombia it buys efficient; Tania Carmona Razo, in the ant; Félix Darío Razoin the regional Sena of Cesar; Edgar García Mallorcain the Superintendence of Notaries and Registration; Leila García Mallorca, in the Ministry of Environment; Ángela María Araújowife of a river cousin in the Ministry of Justice.
“How many relatives of David Razo well accommodated? What criticized before being a government, criticized nepotism, clientelism, exploitation, slavery. Today they do everything calcadito to the letter. That is, it means that these people of the historical pact did not bother him these horrible things that happen in politics,” Hernández added.
Public opinion statement
Here I am, answering, as always.
Since September 2024, on the occasion of publications in opinion portals, I have been the subject of an investigation in the Supreme Court of Justice, natural judge of the congressmen. Research that originated in a request that I made and ex officio by said corporation. The nature of this process requires absolute reserve parties, which limits the scope of my pronouncements. I hope this limiting is understood justly.
At that time, as now, information of anonymous origin was attributed to my person, without even mediating a verification or authenticity. Precisely because of this uncertainty, I considered an investigation urgent that could account for the origin, reason or scope that such communications were supposedly attributed to my name.
The idea that they attribute to me false information worries me, hence this pronouncement. But more worries the idea that by virtue of a third party having access to my private communications, it frightens me; My intimacy and that of my family, the life of my friends, my own security and that of the political group I belong is at stake. The acquaintances and painful history of the Chuzadas, and more recently of, are realities that force to take any threat to communications.
In 2020, for approximately 6 months, my family and I had a small family venture. Various circumstances, related to the pandemic, maintained the balances in red and forced the liquidation. That is the only truth.
But now, with a communicative strategy of absolute coordination and “surprise” opportunity, they intend to turn this fact into the Trojan horse of a media lynching that I had never seen. They intend to attack, precisely in the context of the discussion about labor reform, the very basis of what I have defended throughout life, being consistent with the change to which I have served with a petty opposition. They believe that if they manage to get into the same Morral and the media lynching of a simple family venture, it can stop the reforms and stop progress in favor of people. They are wrong. Those who are convinced are wrong when they believe they will stop this social tide by throwing stones at the reforms.
With me they can try everything, here I am and I will try everything, here I am at your entire disposition, I always knew that this was not going to be easy. What they have not understood is that historical changes are above people, and that, if something, what they achieve is to stop or withdraw from the fight because the reflectors point to a distraction or assembly.
To people, everything. To justice, my absolute trust. To the opposition, the debate and the confrontation in front.
